Ovid.com  |  Login  |  Technical Support  
ovid_logo
Search:

Advanced Search
Ovid News
Learn about Ovid’s new research content and products.
Ovid Events
Check out where Ovid is across the globe at industry conferences and events worldwide.
Are you affiliated with a leading medical or academic institution?
If so, send your librarian an email recommending titles you’ve found valuable for research at your institution.
Home About Products & Services Contact Us btn_contact1
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
tabmenu

January 2006, 194:1 > Five years to the term breech trial:...
< Previous  |   Next >
ARTICLE LINKS:
Fulltext  |  PDF (244 K)
Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial.

CLINICAL OPINION

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 194(1):20-25, January 2006.
Glezerman, Marek MD

Abstract:
Objective: On the basis of the end points of neonatal morbidity and death, the authors of the term breech trial concluded unequivocally that cesarean delivery was safer for breech babies.

Study design: Analysis of the original and new data gives rise to serious concerns as far as study design, methods, and conclusions are concerned. In a substantial number of cases, there was a lack of adherence to the inclusion criteria. There was a large interinstitutional variation of standard of care; inadequate methods of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment were used, and a large proportion of women were recruited during active labor. In many instances of planned vaginal delivery, there was no attendance of a clinician with adequate expertise.

Results: Most cases of neonatal death and morbidity in the term breech trial cannot be attributed to the mode of delivery. Moreover, analysis of outcome after 2 years has shown no difference between vaginal and abdominal deliveries of breech babies.

Conclusion: The original term breech trial recommendations should be withdrawn.

(C) Mosby-Year Book Inc. 2006. All Rights Reserved.